Clients ask “how much is AI?”
Teams use Gemini, ChatGPT, and other models alongside Photoshop or Figma. When a client or platform asks how much of the work was AI-generated, most teams answer from memory.
Provenance for creative work
LexAI tells the story behind each deliverable — which parts came from your team, which from AI, and how they came together into the final design.
This site is the public website. The LexAI Provenance product app lives in the frontend/ folder of this repo. For local run steps, see the note above.
Teams use Gemini, ChatGPT, and other models alongside Photoshop or Figma. When a client or platform asks how much of the work was AI-generated, most teams answer from memory.
Policies increasingly require teams to explain which tools were used and who contributed what. Without a provenance layer, it's hard to provide anything beyond screenshots and narrative.
A summary page that shows human vs AI contribution, key editing actions, evidence strength, and any risk notes for a single result.
Overlay human and AI contribution directly on top of the final image. Click units to see where they apply on the canvas.
Break down contribution scores by unit to show how much of the final result was human-led vs AI-assisted, overall and per slice.
Generate a certificate-style report that you can print, save as PDF, or share via link for clients, legal, or submissions.
LexAI is built around a realistic seven-tool stack, so design teams can start with the tools they already use.
Lightweight agent watches saves and exports from Photoshop and Paint, linked to a project.
Best-effort capture of AI and design activity in the browser for tools like Gemini or Figma.
Exports from Figma or Canva are recorded as key events for the final deliverable.
Designers can confirm or correct which sessions and outputs belong to a project before proof.
In the LexAI app, these tools and capture styles feed into one contribution model, so Proof, Overlay, Split, and Report all tell the same story for a single result.
LexAI is designed for design companies, content studios, and in-house creative teams who work across many tools and contributors on the same project.
This section focuses on practical business use: multi-source creative work inside a single project, clear attribution review, and shareable proof for external stakeholders.
The sections below summarize how the LexAI Provenance app is implemented and prepared around final-result analysis, multi-source attribution, and rights-proof / settlement concepts. They are written for product, founder presentation, and evidence use.
The core LexAI story is simple: Gemini → nanobanana → Photoshop, all visible in one timeline and one report.
Start with the same seven-tool story we use for demos, then layer in your own tools and workflows.
Download the desktop tracker ZIP, extract it, set your project id, and run — events show in the LexAI app Project Home when the backend is reachable.
LexAI uses a lightweight Windows agent to capture saves, exports, and app activity from tools like Photoshop. Use the download below, then point it at your project in the LexAI app.
Download desktop tracker (ZIP)
LexAI-Tracker.exe,
.env.example, SETUP.txt, and README.md (no Python required).
LexAI-Tracker.exe once: it creates .env automatically if missing. Set
LEXAI_AGENT_PROJECT_ID to the number from your LexAI Hub URL (?project_id=...).
LexAI-Tracker.exe again after editing .env. Leave the console window
open while you work; events go to LexAI when the backend is reachable.
lexai-desktop-tracker.zip from the same releases folder for Python source +
pip install -r requirements.txt and python main.py.
project_id you configured for the agent.
README.md inside the downloaded agent folder, or the
agent/README.md file in the GitHub repository.
LexAI Provenance is being developed together with Korean patent applications including “최종 결과물 기준 이벤트 연계 분석을 통한 창작 과정 이벤트 처리 방법 및 시스템” and related inventions around multi-source contribution attribution and rights-proof preparation. The flow below summarizes how the product reflects these ideas in practice.
This implementation flow is product-facing documentation only and does not describe legal claims. It is intended to show that the patented concepts are being implemented and prepared in a real system as part of LexAI's product work.
The table below summarizes concrete LexAI features that relate to final-result-based event analysis, multi-source contribution attribution, and future rights-proof / settlement preparation.
These capabilities are described as product features and roadmap items only. They are intended to provide clear, screenshot-friendly evidence of how LexAI operationalizes and prepares the concepts in the related patent applications.
The four main LexAI screens below are concrete UI surfaces that implement final-result-based analysis, multi-source contribution attribution, and (for the report) rights-proof preparation.
Final-result-based summary view for a single artifact and version. Shows human vs AI contribution, tools used, evidence level, and risk notes for that result (1st and 3rd patent-linked concepts).
Visual layer on top of the final image where each contribution unit is mapped to regions. Connects event-linked units to specific parts of the final result and makes multi-source attribution visible on the canvas (1st and 3rd patent-linked concepts).
Table and summary that allocate contribution scores across human vs AI and per unit. Uses final-result event linkage and multi-source scores to show how different tools and participants contributed (1st and 3rd patent-linked concepts).
Printable, shareable report for the selected result, combining project context, tools, contribution shares, and evidence notes into one document. Serves as a practical proof/certificate output today and a base for future rights-proof and settlement packages (1st, 3rd, and 4th patent-linked concepts).
This screen mapping is written for product and evidence purposes only. It is intended to make it easy to capture screenshots or PDFs that show how LexAI operationalizes each concept in a real interface.
LexAI already generates certificate-style reports for individual results and is being prepared for use as a rights-proof package and, later, as an input to settlement or licensing flows.
This section describes product behavior and planned extensions only. It is intended to support evidence that LexAI has a real certificate/report layer today and is being actively prepared for rights-proof and settlement-related use cases, without claiming that full legal settlement logic is already live.
The points below summarize concrete LexAI Provenance behaviors that can be used as evidence of implementation and preparation for the related patent concepts.
This highlight block is written purely as a product summary and is intended to be easy to capture as a single screenshot or PDF section when assembling supporting material.
The LexAI Provenance product is being developed together with several Korean patent applications. The table below summarizes key applications and how they relate to the current implementation work.
| Patent concept | Title (Korean) | Application no. | LexAI Provenance context |
|---|---|---|---|
| First patent | 최종 결과물 기준 이벤트 연계 분석을 통한 창작 과정 이벤트 처리 방법 및 시스템 | (to be filled with official number) | Implemented today as final-result-based event linkage and analysis for a single artifact and version, surfaced in Project Home, LexAI Proof, LexAI Overlay, LexAI Split, and LexAI Report. |
| Third patent | (multi-source collaborative contribution attribution concept) | (to be filled with official number) | Reflected in multi-tool, multi-contributor event capture and attribution across tools and participants, as shown in the seven-tool support, project activity streams, and contribution views (Proof, Overlay, Split, Report). |
| Fourth patent | (rights-proof package / atomic settlement preparation concept) | (to be filled with official number) | Reflected in the current certificate-style LexAI Report and in the prepared direction for rights-proof packages and future settlement/licensing inputs based on final-result-centered contribution data. |
This block is for product and documentation purposes only. It is intended as structured, screenshot-friendly reference material and does not state or interpret legal claims.
The table below summarizes, at a glance, how each patent concept relates to specific LexAI Provenance functions and screens.
| Patent concept | Product function | Related screen / workflow | Implementation / preparation context |
|---|---|---|---|
| First patent Final-result analysis |
Final-result-based event analysis for a single artifact and version. | Project Home selection, LexAI Proof, LexAI Overlay, LexAI Split, LexAI Report. | Implemented: events are linked to the selected result and analyzed across these screens to show human vs AI contribution, regions, and shares. |
| Third patent Multi-source attribution |
Multi-tool, multi-contributor contribution attribution in one model. | Seven-tool tracking, project activity streams, contribution units and scores in LexAI Proof, Overlay, Split, and Report. | Implemented: events from desktop tools and AI models are normalized into shared contribution units and scores so teams can review how different sources contributed to one result. |
| Fourth patent Rights-proof / settlement |
Certificate-style outputs and preparation for rights-proof packages and settlement inputs. | LexAI Report; future rights-proof package and platform/settlement workflows. | Implemented: LexAI Report as a certificate-style output for each result. Prepared: organizing report and contribution data so it can be bundled as rights-proof and used as an input to later settlement/licensing logic. |
This summary is written from a product perspective and is intended to be easy to capture as a single table when compiling supporting evidence. It does not attempt to restate or interpret any legal claims.